I can NOT FUCKING STAND RUST!!!!!!
by House - Friday July 21, 2023 at 02:32 AM
#1
I swear to god, I can not go one fucking day without meeting one of these TRANNY SHITPOSTING RETARDS who keeps trying to FUCKING CONVINCE ME TO WRITE IN RUST. I CAN NOT FUCKING TAKE IT ANYMORe!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
#2
LOL KILL THEM ALL
SERVICES NOT HQ  Heart
Reply
#3
(Jul 21, 2023, 09:05 AM)c4ke Wrote: you better learn it bruh, it's a N eW iNd u s TR y standard for safety
lmao

Sure it's so new and memory safe well I WANT TO KILL MYSELF IS THAT SAFE????
Reply
#4
Understandable ahahhahaha
Reply
#5
Rust is inferior to C++ because the trash that is added to make the program "safe" bloats the code. It does not allow the same freedom as C++ either.
Reply
#6
(Jul 21, 2023, 08:41 PM)Mishka Wrote: Rust is inferior to C++, the garbage collection and trash that is added to make the program "safe" bloats the code. It does not allow the same freedom as C++ either.

Rust doesn't have garbage collection, and it has the unsafe keyword so you can use it in just about any place you can use C++, that's why rust is included in operating system kernels, but Linus doesn't want C++ in his kernel.

Only bad thing about rust, is the disgusting fucking syntax...
SERVICES NOT HQ  Heart
Reply
#7
(Jul 21, 2023, 08:50 PM)jahy Wrote:
(Jul 21, 2023, 08:41 PM)Mishka Wrote: Rust is inferior to C++, the garbage collection and trash that is added to make the program "safe" bloats the code. It does not allow the same freedom as C++ either.

Rust doesn't have garbage collection, and it has the unsafe keyword so you can use it in just about any place you can use C++, that's why rust is included in operating system kernels, but Linus doesn't want C++ in his kernel.

Only bad thing about rust, is the disgusting fucking syntax...

I might have mistaken it for something else, either way it is inferior to good written C++ code.
Reply
#8
(Jul 21, 2023, 08:50 PM)jahy Wrote:
(Jul 21, 2023, 08:41 PM)Mishka Wrote: Rust is inferior to C++, the garbage collection and trash that is added to make the program "safe" bloats the code. It does not allow the same freedom as C++ either.

Rust doesn't have garbage collection, and it has the unsafe keyword so you can use it in just about any place you can use C++, that's why rust is included in operating system kernels, but Linus doesn't want C++ in his kernel.

Only bad thing about rust, is the disgusting fucking syntax...

Thank you.
Reply
#9
(Jul 21, 2023, 08:41 PM)Mishka Wrote: Rust is inferior to C++ because the trash that is added to make the program "safe" bloats the code. It does not allow the same freedom as C++ either.

Rust only has good compiler error messages
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Largest Discord User History Archive - 10m+ Users Mega 318 40,226 9 hours ago
Last Post: phas3lock
  A collection of deepweb sites [2025] dg7ka 108 3,108 Yesterday, 09:29 PM
Last Post: Moneymaking123
  In front an abuse in the school, any suggestion? dai5 0 120 Yesterday, 11:02 AM
Last Post: dai5
  Questrade leak anyone? username000 0 200 May 01, 2026, 11:36 PM
Last Post: username000
  OSINT repositories by country browdbrowniebread 0 287 Apr 30, 2026, 07:41 PM
Last Post: browdbrowniebread

Forum Jump:


 Users browsing this forum: 1 Guest(s)