Posts: 1,314
Threads: 226
Joined: Jun 2023
Jul 24, 2024, 02:39 PM
(This post was last modified: Jul 24, 2024, 02:39 PM by xzin0vich.)
Instead of ban leecher, there is a list of feature ideas to avoid leeching and raise awareness among the newfags about this.
- only lock the possibility to reply to posts to suspected leechers, for unlocking this, the suspect needs to make 5 useful threads to contribute to the forums and make an appeal after this.
- Made the leecher pay rank after the second "lock/ban" or refer 10 active users and another appeal.
- Don't ban Leecher with over 1,000 shoutbox messages
- Make the leecher actually useful for the forum.
Posts: 6
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2024
Or just remove the ReplyToView feature which is retarded in and of itself as it fills up the forum with junk posts.
People will leech regardless. Rather have a clean forum than forcing users to post to see the hidden content.
I don't see the need in raising the bar like this. Isn't the whole point of the forum making data available? If not, it should be posted in a section for upgraded members and have the credits removed for that upgraded only area.
Posts: 1,314
Threads: 226
Joined: Jun 2023
(Jul 24, 2024, 05:27 PM)NoSleeper Wrote: Or just remove the ReplyToView feature which is retarded in and of itself as it fills up the forum with junk posts.
People will leech regardless. Rather have a clean forum than forcing users to post to see the hidden content.
I don't see the need in raising the bar like this. Isn't the whole point of the forum making data available? If not, it should be posted in a section for upgraded members and have the credits removed for that upgraded only area.
ReplyToView is needed for "bumping' useful content and make this more ,"""viral""" +this is a good concept that exist everywhere
So leecher are useful in some case.
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2026
Maybe a level system would be useful, instead of ReplyToView This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: Permanent (N/A Remaining) Ban Reason: Contact Administration.
Posts: 1,314
Threads: 226
Joined: Jun 2023
(Jul 25, 2024, 10:53 AM)KanColle Wrote: Maybe a level system would be useful, instead of ReplyToView
Level with reputation system
Posts: 3
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2026
(Jul 25, 2024, 12:15 PM)xzin0vich Wrote: (Jul 25, 2024, 10:53 AM)KanColle Wrote: Maybe a level system would be useful, instead of ReplyToView
Level with reputation system
or with a combination of posts, threads, rep, time online and maybe likes if they ever implement them
that would make more sense than reputation alone ig This forum account is currently banned. Ban Length: Permanent (N/A Remaining) Ban Reason: Contact Administration.
Posts: 343
Threads: 66
Joined: Mar 2024
Aug 04, 2024, 01:40 AM
(This post was last modified: Aug 04, 2024, 01:44 AM by Dev.)
(Jul 24, 2024, 05:27 PM)NoSleeper Wrote: Or just remove the ReplyToView feature which is retarded in and of itself as it fills up the forum with junk posts.
People will leech regardless. Rather have a clean forum than forcing users to post to see the hidden content.
I don't see the need in raising the bar like this. Isn't the whole point of the forum making data available? If not, it should be posted in a section for upgraded members and have the credits removed for that upgraded only area.
Your suggestion is garbage. You clearly don't understand, how about you change your perspective and try to understand instead.
> Isn't the whole point of the forum making data available?
YEAH But not for any twat with a web scraper, there's a reason it is the way it is.
There could be a section for upgraded members only, yeah. thats not bad. Nobody will post much in it though because again, we post shit for the credits, to spend the credits.
(Jul 25, 2024, 10:53 AM)KanColle Wrote: Maybe a level system would be useful, instead of ReplyToView
Pretty weak suggestion. I decline this being a good idea. (Jul 25, 2024, 05:21 PM)KanColle Wrote: (Jul 25, 2024, 12:15 PM)xzin0vich Wrote: (Jul 25, 2024, 10:53 AM)KanColle Wrote: Maybe a level system would be useful, instead of ReplyToView
Level with reputation system
or with a combination of posts, threads, rep, time online and maybe likes if they ever implement them
that would make more sense than reputation alone ig
.. yeah literally post shit that isn't 'thanks for the leak' 53x in a row and you're likely not getting nuked for being a leecher, post a thread or two every once in a while and they're fine. reputation based makes no sense imo
|