I was thrilled to see this up & running again. My friends informed me about it a few minutes ago. I'm not a hacker, never was, never will be, BUT, I've been a data collector for 24 years, which I use to help other people LOCATE people, including lawyers, Licensed PI's, Doctors & even those wanting to locate a missing family member. So, thank you for getting it back on line.
I'm going through some shit at the moment over a God damn file I posted that was nothing more than Public Records & every name & detail in it, can be found in my new 2025 Consumer Data files. Don't understand why these ass-wipe cops seem to think I did something illegal, but the mother fucker sent me a search warrant letter signed by a judge to go through my fucking emails & other shit, which I know for a fact, has nothing illegal in it. lol ! I even mention in most emails that I never hacked a damn thing or stole anything from anyone. What the fuck more do they need to know about me ? lol ! I'll deal with this shit on Monday. I sent the prick an email, which I had to hunt through a million files to find two of his & one bounced. lol ! If the bastard comes after me, he will need to bring a doctor & an ambulance, because I'm 79 years old & on HOSPICE today. Dying old fart. lol !! He will never find a damn thing that I have stolen, because I never have done it. I only take things I can SEE online without hacking into anything or using a password.
I sent him this below, you can read the full report by downloading it.
Preliminary Injunction - Computer Fraud & Abuse Act.pdf (149.3 KB)
https://gofile.io/d/mzmjMc
Which shows this as part of the whole report, "read it & know your rights". If you can "SEE it" (without breaking into anything), you can copy it. Fuck them. That goes for what you see on HERE.
Preliminary Injunction / Computer Fraud and Abuse Act The panel affirmed the district court’s preliminary injunction forbidding the professional networking website LinkedIn Corp. from denying plaintiff hiQ, a data analytics company, access to publicly available LinkedIn member profiles.
Using automated bots, hiQ scrapes information that LinkedIn users have included on public LinkedIn profiles. LinkedIn sent hiQ a cause-and-desist letter, demanding that hiQ stop accessing and copying data from LinkedIn’s server. HiQ filed suit, seeking injunctive relief based on California law and a declaratory judgment that LinkedIn could not lawfully invoke the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, California Penal Code § 502©, or the common law of trespass against it.
Affirming the district court’s grant of the preliminary injunction in favor of hiQ, the panel concluded that hiQ established a likelihood of irreparable harm because the survival of its business was threatened. The panel held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in balancing the equities and concluding that, even if some LinkedIn users retain some privacy interests in their information notwithstanding their decision to make their profiles public,
** This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader
