Any good open-source crypters?
by Mandala - Friday March 21, 2025 at 05:46 PM
#11
(Mar 25, 2025, 05:48 AM)Alcxtraze Wrote: this is only from personal experience especially against WD "xD"

WD for endpoint actually does work
Reply
#12
(Mar 25, 2025, 05:48 AM)Alcxtraze Wrote: this is only from personal experience especially against WD "xD"

Yes WD's cloud sandbox is very picky for executable that is not signed, same executable with no changes besides valid cert has no issue. If you are more informed please do share im very open to changes.

(Mar 23, 2025, 04:26 PM)Mandala Wrote:
(Mar 23, 2025, 04:02 AM)vobka Wrote: Have you checked what creates the detection?

The stub’s memory allocation method (VirtualAlloc + RWX) is getting nuked.

(Mar 23, 2025, 04:02 AM)vobka Wrote: Comment out code until you are not getting detected and slowly start narrowing down the point. After this you can try to throw off the heuristics unless its completely ruined by AV. Such as WD will flag for persistence when trying to run key to the binary from where the call is coming from.

Thinking of switching to indirect syscalls + RW -> RX remapping and wishing it works. To be honest, I did not want to write my own crypter, but maybe it will be easier than trying to modify existing crypters.

Interesting, ive always had a flag after execution, never from allocating even with RWX
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Bypass Cookies Encryption | Working FrancisMDouble 8 1,066 7 hours ago
Last Post: 0x0xGunger998
  Malware On Steroids 0neSh0t 348 24,261 7 hours ago
Last Post: 0x0xGunger998
  [ LIST ] 5 FREE STEALERS WITH PROS/CONS elix 391 15,388 7 hours ago
Last Post: 0x0xGunger998
  Malware Development MD MZ E Book Mandala 51 2,024 7 hours ago
Last Post: 0x0xGunger998
  3 sektor7 free courses NEO123 50 3,428 7 hours ago
Last Post: 0x0xGunger998

Forum Jump:


 Users browsing this forum: 1 Guest(s)